Sign In
If Jagex really want to be about diversity, then have to changes in OSRS! from wangrui's blog
They have done nothing but buy RuneScape gold draw attention to the fact that they are embarrassed of their composing, but are prepared to change it When they don't release the upgrade for Old School. There is likely to be snowy robe'd riots in Falador if it IS released by them for Old School. The half-release makes them look like incinsere panderers, and also a full-release will undoubtedly make RuneScape"less welcoming" due to community backlash. From time to time, the move is not to playwith.
TBH I believe OSRS would change it, but not before properly altering the quest text. The current changes make a great deal of dialogue not make sense and break it. The OSRS community will be fine with all the change save a few whiners, but they would not let lazy QA go through. I wonder if RS3 doesn't care since the number of players who complete the Feud per month is minimal, In all honesty. Meanwhile OSRS nevertheless has a lot of players that are newer in order that they may QA it better. In any event, breaking a pursuit as it could have been altered to make sense with nominal exertion (i.e. having everybody's name change to Ali either during or until you beat the pursuit ) would make the narrative still make sense. Maintaining Alice and that's name.
The very best heavyweight boxer in the world in the minute calls himself the gypsy king and no one bats an eye. And everyone in pollnivneach is named Ali since his will was left by the mayor Ali; but no one came forward. So it became tradition kid it to attempt to claim and to name yourself. The jungle savage modifications make sense, and I will see the gypsy one offending some people. But the Ali change is pure pandering. There's literally lore behind it, and it's a small area in the desert.
It wouldn't be the first time that they made a change that applies to 2 games however made the difference. They didn't bother to change the Romeo and Juilet quest though this was apparently a copyright problem using RS3, as it's release back in 2013, yet it has been in OSRS. There was no copyright dilemma; all of Shakespeare's works are in the public domain.The copyright/trademark dilemma was using the nurses hat bearing the red cross /u/g_snn However it's still red on OSRS.It's not a copyright or trademark, those perish. It's a part of the Geneva conference and immediately protected by related nation legislation.
You are able to play post-apocalypse, modern horror, sci-fi, epic fantasy, pre-history, steampunk, and even some fairly unique genre settings. There is all sorts of experience modules from 1 page dungeons into megadungeons into lavishly-detailed configurations to novels consisting largely of random tables. What do you think is missing? Are there any genres, sourcebooks, and tools you'd love to buy rs3 gold have that dont exist? Is there something that you think the OSRS would be useful at that it hasn't done?
TBH I believe OSRS would change it, but not before properly altering the quest text. The current changes make a great deal of dialogue not make sense and break it. The OSRS community will be fine with all the change save a few whiners, but they would not let lazy QA go through. I wonder if RS3 doesn't care since the number of players who complete the Feud per month is minimal, In all honesty. Meanwhile OSRS nevertheless has a lot of players that are newer in order that they may QA it better. In any event, breaking a pursuit as it could have been altered to make sense with nominal exertion (i.e. having everybody's name change to Ali either during or until you beat the pursuit ) would make the narrative still make sense. Maintaining Alice and that's name.
The very best heavyweight boxer in the world in the minute calls himself the gypsy king and no one bats an eye. And everyone in pollnivneach is named Ali since his will was left by the mayor Ali; but no one came forward. So it became tradition kid it to attempt to claim and to name yourself. The jungle savage modifications make sense, and I will see the gypsy one offending some people. But the Ali change is pure pandering. There's literally lore behind it, and it's a small area in the desert.
It wouldn't be the first time that they made a change that applies to 2 games however made the difference. They didn't bother to change the Romeo and Juilet quest though this was apparently a copyright problem using RS3, as it's release back in 2013, yet it has been in OSRS. There was no copyright dilemma; all of Shakespeare's works are in the public domain.The copyright/trademark dilemma was using the nurses hat bearing the red cross /u/g_snn However it's still red on OSRS.It's not a copyright or trademark, those perish. It's a part of the Geneva conference and immediately protected by related nation legislation.
You are able to play post-apocalypse, modern horror, sci-fi, epic fantasy, pre-history, steampunk, and even some fairly unique genre settings. There is all sorts of experience modules from 1 page dungeons into megadungeons into lavishly-detailed configurations to novels consisting largely of random tables. What do you think is missing? Are there any genres, sourcebooks, and tools you'd love to buy rs3 gold have that dont exist? Is there something that you think the OSRS would be useful at that it hasn't done?
The Wall